|
2.1 Forest degradation
Almost entire area of forests of the
state has been subjected to severe degradation. During survey of forest
resources in the state by FSI in 1989, it is shown that majority of forest
areas (up to 72.73%) are heavily to moderately degraded.
The forest cover in Tripura is 67.4 % of the geographical area according to
the latest Assessment by the Forest Survey of India which has categorised the forests in to two major conopy density classes as : 33% dense forest (>40%
density) & 34.4% as open forest (10 to 40% density). The details of
forest cover classification in different years are as detailed below:
|
Assessment year
|
Very Dense Forest (km2) (above 70% density)
|
Dense forest
(above 40% density)
|
Open forest (km2)
(40% – 10% density)
|
Scrub
(below 10% density)
|
Total (km2)
|
|
1989
|
-
|
1214
|
4111
|
|
5352
|
|
1991
|
-
|
1825
|
3710
|
|
5535
|
|
1993
|
-
|
1819
|
3719
|
|
5538
|
|
1995
|
-
|
1819
|
3719
|
|
5538
|
|
1997
|
-
|
1819
|
3727
|
|
5546
|
|
1999
|
-
|
2228
|
3517
|
|
5745
|
|
2001
|
-
|
3463
|
3602
|
|
7065
|
|
2003
|
58
|
4988
|
3047
|
|
8093
|
|
2005
|
61
|
4969
|
3125
|
59
|
8214
|
|
2007
|
113
|
4816
|
3244
|
54
|
8227
|
|
2009
|
111
|
4770
|
3192
|
75
|
8148
|
There has been no substantial change
in forest cover in the State between 1989 and the 1995 as per assessment,
even though 60,970 ha (609.70Km2) of plantation was raised in the State
during 1989-1995. The 1993
Assessment recorded an increase of 9 km2 in the open forest category, along
with a decrease of 6 km2 in the dense forest category. The transfer of
larger area under open category signifies large-scale degradation of
forests in the intervening period.
As per 1999 assessment though there has been increase on overall
forest cover although an area of 206 km2 of dense forest has been
transferred to open forest category, thereby partly offsetting the increase
of 405 km2 dense forests.
As per 2001 assessment report there has been an increase of 1320 km2,
showing an increase in dense forests by 1235 km2 whereas open
forests have increased by 85 km2. Dense forests constitute 33%
of the geographical area whereas 34.4% area is under open forests. As per 2003 assessment, an area of 58 km2
is ranked as very dense forest.
Moreover, there has been improvement in open forests getting
converted to dense forests (497 km2). Overall increase in forest cover has been
to the tune of 2796 km2. This increase has been prtly due to bringing tea gardens etc. under the
classification of “Tree Cover” The figure of dense forest cover though
higher than the national average of 12.68%, is comparative to the average
for the North-East (34.84%).
During the past few years there have
been changes in forest cover. Though the area of dense cover has first
increased and then slightly decreased, yet the area under open forests has
also changed reflecting some degradation and loss of forest cover. Forest
Survey of India’s 2009 report attributes this loss of forest cover (79
Km^2) to shifting cultivation.
While the forests of Tripura have been under systematic management for past
fifty years, this fragile resource base has been changing due to various
anthropogenic disturbances resulting in degradation which is directly
affecting the ecological stability, biological diversity, economic
viability & environmental security of the state. The main problems
/issues in this regard are as follows:
2.1.1 Influx of people from Bangladesh
There had been large influx of people
in Tripura from the neighbouring
country, the erstwhile East Pakistan (now Bangladesh). The fast growth in population (density
304 per square km., 2001 census) in the State, coupled with poor
infrastructure and lack of alternative livelihood options resulted in
mounting pressure on forest and forestland.
This has also led to reduction in per capita forest area from 0.97
ha to a present level of 0.18 ha. and
encroachments and over exploitation of forest resources. Smuggling of forest produce through 856
km long porous border with Bangladesh
has been a serious problem. Though now most of the border has been fenced,
some gaps still remain. Smuggling through rivers still continues. This is a
big challenge and the Perspective Plan proposes to tackle this problem head
on through creation of infrastructure and other assets including capacity
building and networking with active cooperation of the local people.
Shifting Cultivation
During implementation of The Schedule
Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dweller (Recognition of Forest Right)
Act, 2006, 116000 families have been identified as dependent upon forest
land. Over 166000 ha of forest land rights have been recognized and
necessary documents have been issued to the beneficiaries.
Besides, a large number of Tribal
families practice shifting cultivation (jhum).This
form of primitive agricultural practice is well rooted in cultural ethos of
the tribal and is major cause of deforestation, land degradation and soil
impoverishment. From the survey conducted by Tribal Welfare Department
(1990), it is estimated that this form of cultivation is presently
practiced by around 55,049 tribal households over 35,000 — 40,000 ha
annually, equivalent to 6% of the forestland in the State. Systematic efforts are being made through
different schemes for in-situ rehabilitation of these tribal along with
rehabilitation of degraded forests, but the problem still persists.
2.1.4 Forest encroachments
Encroachment of forestland is a
serious threat to forests and its conservation. As per record maintained by
the Forest Department, the position is alarming and needs special attention
to tackle this problem. The position of encroachment up to 1991 is shown
below:
|
Period
|
Number of Families
|
Area Encroached (ha)
|
|
Before 1980
|
16,210
|
5305.30
|
|
After 1980
|
27,005
|
8620.40
|
|
Total
|
43,215
|
13,925.71
|
The category wise position of
encroachment of forest land is as given below:
|
Period
|
R.F. (ha)
|
P.R.F. (ha)
|
P.F. (ha)
|
Total
(ha)
|
|
Before 1980
|
3209.50
|
752.61
|
1343.19
|
5305.30
|
|
After 1980
|
4981.34
|
1374.93
|
2264.14
|
8620.41
|
|
Total
|
8190.84
|
2127.54
|
3607.33
|
13,925.71
|
The latest survey conducted by
Revenue Department of Tripura to assess the actual
encroachment in forestland, has shown encroachment to the extent of 593.11
km2. This has not only caused loss of forest area but has also
created perpetual site of degradation of forest.
2.1.5 Forest Fire
Forest fires are common and frequent in the
plains (around 20% of the total forest area of the State) as the villagers,
at the end of winter, set fire to get flush of new grass for their cattle.
Forest Survey of India (1993) has estimated that forest fire has led to
heavy to moderate degradation of around 6.16% of the forests.
The forests atop all the hills in the
State get burnt due to Jhum fire which spreads to
nearby forest areas. This causes
immense harm catchments completely wiping out regeneration (natural as well
as artificial). It also adversely
affect already threatened many a wildlife species. The main constraints in control of forest
fires are lack of communication facility for early detection of forest fire
and also the lack of fire fighting equipments.
2.1.6
Grazing
According to livestock census of
1992, there were 14.683 lakhs of domestic animals
(cattle, sheep and goat) in the State with 2.9% annual rate of increase. In
a survey (1997) it is reported that the domestic animals are now 19.17 lakhs. It is estimated that 60% of this animal
population graze in the forest area and cause soil compaction and heavy
damage to the forest plantations and natural regeneration areas. The
intensity of such disturbances, especially near the habitation, is far
beyond the carrying capacity of the forests.
There are no grazing grounds. The community lands for grazing purpose
in villages have either been encroached upon or diverted to other land
use. Thus grazing constitutes a threat
to forest conservation in the State. Enforcement of strict control or
imposition of restrictions on such disturbance under present socio-economic
condition is practically impossible. A well designed interface with ARDD
for a rational livestock planning and augmenting
fodder availability is urgently required.
2.1.7 Unrecorded removal of forest
produce
The adverse effect of unrecorded
removal of forest produce is steadily increasing with increase in
population, without corresponding increase in forest area.
There is immense pressure on forests
from fringe dwellers for basic requirements, as well as from miscreants
involved in illegal felling and smuggling of forest resources across the
border. This has lead to severe degradation of existing forest resources in
the State. Simultaneously the forests are viewed as a source of livelihood
by the millions living below poverty line.
|